Arch directory restructuring: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(More details that were missing) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The ''arch'' directory is a mess with lots of copy-pasted code. Ideally it should be '''consistently and logically organized''': each directory should have a documented purpose in order to leave as little doubt as possible about ''what goes where''. Additionally, each directory's purpose makes sense in the overall structure, without overlaps between the scope of each directory. | The ''arch'' directory is a mess with lots of copy-pasted code. Ideally it should be '''consistently and logically organized''': each directory should have a documented purpose in order to leave as little doubt as possible about ''what goes where''. Additionally, each directory's purpose makes sense in the overall structure, without overlaps between the scope of each directory. | ||
At the moment however we observe this is not the case. We believe that in order to make the future growth of Miosix simpler and faster, the right moment to rectify the situation is now. | At the moment however we observe this is not the case. We believe that in order to make the future growth of Miosix simpler and faster, the right moment to rectify the situation is now. | ||
''Update 31/12/2023'' I discovered a bug in the testing branch of Miosix which was caused by the copy-pasting of gpio_impl.h: version 1.4 (sic, see comments) didn't have the alternateFunction method of Gpio, even though serial_stm32.cpp assumes it always exists. (btw don't we have git? manual versioning in comments is not a robust practice!!!) I bet other similar bugs exist. | |||
== Some definitions == | == Some definitions == | ||
Common sense suggests the following taxonomy of parts for MCU-equipped devices targeted by Miosix: | Common sense suggests the following taxonomy of parts for MCU-equipped devices targeted by Miosix: | ||
* Board: The device itself being targeted. It's called a board because nobody has observed any MCU wired with point-to-point wiring yet. Includes the MCU itself plus any peripheral external to the MCU but '''driven''' by it. | * Board: The device itself being targeted. It's called a board because nobody has observed any MCU wired with point-to-point wiring yet (citation needed). Includes the MCU itself plus any peripheral external to the MCU but '''driven''' by it. | ||
* Chip: The MCU itself. May come in RAM/OTP/ROM/Flash size variations, which are mostly ignored. | * Chip: The MCU itself. May come in RAM/OTP/ROM/Flash size variations, which are mostly ignored. | ||
* Chip family: A set of MCU types from the same manufacturer with the same microprocessor core but potentially different set of peripherals. While the available set of peripherals may vary, the behaviour and I/O ports of each kind of peripheral are the same across the entire family. Thanks to the brilliant ideas of the various marketing departments of each vendor, the classification here can get very fluid. | * Chip family: A set of MCU types from the same manufacturer with the same microprocessor core but potentially different set of peripherals. While the available set of peripherals may vary, the behaviour and I/O ports of each kind of peripheral are the same across the entire family. Thanks to the brilliant ideas of the various marketing departments of each vendor, the classification here can get very fluid. | ||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
* The board is the stm32f4discovery itself. It includes the chip, and miscellaneous peripherals such as an accelerometer and a Cirrus Logic audio chip. The STLink programming interface and the power supply are '''not''' considered relevant parts of the board for Miosix, as the MCU is not in control of what they do. | * The board is the stm32f4discovery itself. It includes the chip, and miscellaneous peripherals such as an accelerometer and a Cirrus Logic audio chip. The STLink programming interface and the power supply are '''not''' considered relevant parts of the board for Miosix, as the MCU is not in control of what they do. | ||
* The chip is an STM32F407VGT6. The VGT6 suffix of the chip name specifies package (100 pin LQFP), Flash size (1MB) and temperature range options (see the datasheet at the "Ordering Information" page). | * The chip is an STM32F407VGT6. The VGT6 suffix of the chip name specifies package (100 pin LQFP), Flash size (1MB) and temperature range options (see the datasheet at the "Ordering Information" page). | ||
* The chip family is STM32F4. This can be inferred by the fact that all available chips with this prefix in the part name share the same reference manual. | * The chip family is STM32F4. This can be inferred by the fact that all available chips with this prefix in the part name share the same reference manual. (Notice that this is a slight simplification of reality because there are STM32F4 chips that are not covered by the same reference manual as the STM32F407 but the point we want to get across is that multiple MCUs share roughly the same silicon behaviour and drivers) | ||
* The core is an ARM Cortex M4, as stated in the datasheet. Roughly, ST buys the Verilog for the core from ARM and then takes care of the manufacturing. As far as we know, ARM's licence | * The core is an ARM Cortex M4, as stated in the datasheet. Roughly, ST buys the Verilog for the core from ARM and then takes care of the manufacturing. As far as we know, ARM's licence only allows ST to customize the core in very limited ways, so all Cortex M4 cores should behave basically the same, even from other vendors. Tunables may be things like the number of MPU regions or whether floating point is available or not, which may be important or not. | ||
=== What is an architecture? === | === What is an architecture? === | ||
Line 147: | Line 149: | ||
Notice that, despite the name of the defines, there is no distinction between include paths and source paths, as includes are alongside the source. We do not have a problem with this approach, however it results in all includes being publicly available for applications, which is something that is not entirely desirable. | Notice that, despite the name of the defines, there is no distinction between include paths and source paths, as includes are alongside the source. We do not have a problem with this approach, however it results in all includes being publicly available for applications, which is something that is not entirely desirable. | ||
==== Drivers selected by include path ==== | |||
Sometimes Miosix's headers include files that depend on the board selected for building. This of course can give problems when reorganizing files around. The affected files are: | |||
* interfaces/arch_registers.h | |||
* interfaces/bsp.h | |||
* interfaces/gpio.h | |||
* interfaces/portability.h | |||
Overall selecting different files through the include paths is desirable, so we want to avoid adding additional architecture-specific ifdefs as much as possible. | |||
=== Issues === | === Issues === | ||
Line 159: | Line 172: | ||
** Bootstrap code is duplicated multiple times as they are common to boards with the same chip and not common to the board. | ** Bootstrap code is duplicated multiple times as they are common to boards with the same chip and not common to the board. | ||
** Portability code (i.e. context save/restore primitives mostly) is duplicated multiple times as they are common to a given core and not to a chip family | ** Portability code (i.e. context save/restore primitives mostly) is duplicated multiple times as they are common to a given core and not to a chip family | ||
** Linker scripts are also duplicated multiple times | |||
* Classifications sometimes privilege syntax rather than semantics, in an inconsistent fashion | * Classifications sometimes privilege syntax rather than semantics, in an inconsistent fashion | ||
** Directories named '''interfaces_impl''' contain drivers just like directories named '''drivers''', except that they included from /interfaces. | ** Directories named '''interfaces_impl''' contain drivers just like directories named '''drivers''', except that they included from /interfaces. | ||
Line 169: | Line 183: | ||
== A proposal == | == A proposal == | ||
Pointing out what's wrong is easy, fixing it up is hard. Of course "what we should do" is a matter of opinion, and a valid answer to that could even be "nothing". | Pointing out what's wrong is easy, fixing it up is hard. Of course "what we should do" is a matter of opinion, and a valid answer to that could even be "nothing". Overall, what we ultimately want is for all drivers to be decoupled from boards and board groups, in order to be able to classify each driver depending on its actual logical group it belongs to. We can take this opportunity for a more radical restructuring of Miosix's source tree, or we can opt for more conservative solutions. | ||
=== With classification per device type === | === With classification per device type === | ||
This proposal is the most radical as it splits the drivers in a completely different way than what is currently done: by device type. For instance all USART drivers go in a "serial" directory, all GPIO drivers go in a GPIO directory, and so on. This approach scales well when there are a lot of drivers around, but completely prevents selection of drivers by using the include paths. | |||
The arch directory has been named "platform" because of our general dislike of the "architecture" word, but that's really just a bonus. Most other operating systems use "arch" as a directory for drivers and target-specific stuff, so keeping the name "arch" is also an option. We also moved the interfaces headers under the "platform" ("arch") directory, since they basically are just umbrella headers for various drivers. This loses the distinction of some of them being more essential than others, additional directories can be added for this purpose. | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Line 265: | Line 283: | ||
=== Without classification per device type === | === Without classification per device type === | ||
This is just the same proposal as before but which classifies drivers only by "manufacturer" or chip. This allows to use the include trick for selecting headers. | |||
<pre> | <pre> |
Latest revision as of 00:12, 23 October 2024
The arch directory is a mess with lots of copy-pasted code. Ideally it should be consistently and logically organized: each directory should have a documented purpose in order to leave as little doubt as possible about what goes where. Additionally, each directory's purpose makes sense in the overall structure, without overlaps between the scope of each directory. At the moment however we observe this is not the case. We believe that in order to make the future growth of Miosix simpler and faster, the right moment to rectify the situation is now.
Update 31/12/2023 I discovered a bug in the testing branch of Miosix which was caused by the copy-pasting of gpio_impl.h: version 1.4 (sic, see comments) didn't have the alternateFunction method of Gpio, even though serial_stm32.cpp assumes it always exists. (btw don't we have git? manual versioning in comments is not a robust practice!!!) I bet other similar bugs exist.
Some definitions
Common sense suggests the following taxonomy of parts for MCU-equipped devices targeted by Miosix:
- Board: The device itself being targeted. It's called a board because nobody has observed any MCU wired with point-to-point wiring yet (citation needed). Includes the MCU itself plus any peripheral external to the MCU but driven by it.
- Chip: The MCU itself. May come in RAM/OTP/ROM/Flash size variations, which are mostly ignored.
- Chip family: A set of MCU types from the same manufacturer with the same microprocessor core but potentially different set of peripherals. While the available set of peripherals may vary, the behaviour and I/O ports of each kind of peripheral are the same across the entire family. Thanks to the brilliant ideas of the various marketing departments of each vendor, the classification here can get very fluid.
- Core: The microprocessor core used by a given chip family.
Let's take as an example the classic stm32f4discovery board that is the most common development device for Miosix:
- The board is the stm32f4discovery itself. It includes the chip, and miscellaneous peripherals such as an accelerometer and a Cirrus Logic audio chip. The STLink programming interface and the power supply are not considered relevant parts of the board for Miosix, as the MCU is not in control of what they do.
- The chip is an STM32F407VGT6. The VGT6 suffix of the chip name specifies package (100 pin LQFP), Flash size (1MB) and temperature range options (see the datasheet at the "Ordering Information" page).
- The chip family is STM32F4. This can be inferred by the fact that all available chips with this prefix in the part name share the same reference manual. (Notice that this is a slight simplification of reality because there are STM32F4 chips that are not covered by the same reference manual as the STM32F407 but the point we want to get across is that multiple MCUs share roughly the same silicon behaviour and drivers)
- The core is an ARM Cortex M4, as stated in the datasheet. Roughly, ST buys the Verilog for the core from ARM and then takes care of the manufacturing. As far as we know, ARM's licence only allows ST to customize the core in very limited ways, so all Cortex M4 cores should behave basically the same, even from other vendors. Tunables may be things like the number of MPU regions or whether floating point is available or not, which may be important or not.
What is an architecture?
One definition we did not give is the definition of what an architecture is. The reason is that there is no accepted definition for this term, especially for forum pundits and bloggers, but also in academia. The RISC school of thought (Patterson/Hennessy and their spawn) historically associated an architecture with a combination of what are more specifically called the instruction set architecture (ISA) and the microarchitecture of a core. The ISA is the overall structure and design of the instructions, as opposed to the instruction set proper which is the set of instructions accepted by a specific core. The microarchitecture is the overall internal design of the core itself.
Their thesis was that the microarchitecture design will follow naturally from the definition of the ISA, hence simpler ISAs (RISC) to implement always lead to more efficient and generally better cores. Therefore one can consider the architecture to be primarily determined by the ISA. However the industry has proven them wrong, and the most glaring example are Intel x86 chips, which have seen an increasing variety of microarchitectures implementing the same ISA (variously extended of course) with wildly varying levels of (non-)efficiency (in all possible ramifications of "efficiency"). Closer to Miosix's targets, the ARM ISA has been extended so much over the years that its core RISC design has now evolved to basically a traditional CISC ISA, but ARM chips still come in every possible size and flavour.
When we talk about x86 "architectures" or ARM "architectures", but do we mean desktop-grade chips or microcontrollers? Even though they have the same "architecture" the cores in these two classes of chips have nothing to do with each other, they don't even share the same instruction decoder probably. Hence our conclusion that the word "architecture" has now lost all useful meaning for our purposes, and is only useful for void parlor chitchat.
And then we come to Miosix which defines "architecture" (arch) as... a board. Which is not what anyone means when they talk about architecture of anything. For Miosix, an "architecture" is more like what in common parlance would be meant as a "platform".
Current structure
Here's a schematic diagram of how the Miosix arch directory (plus related directories) is configured. In the following / refers to the miosix directory at the top level of the repository.
arch Architecture-specific files common Pool of useful files. Very few files here are common to all archs. CMSIS Collection of ARM & vendor headers following the CMSIS standard core Board independent drivers required for the OS to function (roughly) atomic_ops_*.h Core dependent cache_*.cpp/h Core dependent. This is not required at all for Miosix to work but is nevertheless here *_os_timer.cpp Chip family dependent endianness_*.h Core dependent. Should have a generic (slow) implementation but it's missing. interrupts.h Umbrella header for interrupts_*.h interrupts_*.h Core dependent. Misleading name, this is for fault handling. memory_protection.h Umbrella header for mpu_*.h. Required only for process mode. Name is not consistent with other umbrella headers, should have been "mpu.h" mpu_*.cpp/h Core dependent. drivers Miscellaneous drivers, which are "common" only very roughly dcc.cpp/h Core dependent (but common to all ARM cores apparently) *_adc.cpp/h Chip family dependent serial.h Umbrella header for *serial*.h *serial*.cpp/h Chip family dependent sd_*.cpp/h Chip family dependent servo_*.cpp/h Board dependent really, should go into utils *_hardware_rng.cpp/h Chip family dependent *_rtc.cpp/h Chip family dependent *_sgm.cpp/h Chip family dependent *_wd.cpp/h Chip family dependent *_i2c.cpp/h Chip family dependent <board group name> Board group specific files. common Common drivers and configuration for all the boards in the group arch_settings.h Core dependent. Misleading name, defines requirements for ctxsave interfaces-impl The actual drivers, most of them required by Miosix to function. arch_registers_impl.h Chip family dependent. Includes the appropriate register definitions delays.cpp Chip family dependent as it also depends on ROM/Flash speed. Actually application dependent (!) as cache/prefetch mechanisms can be configured but whatever. gpio_impl.cpp/h Chip family dependent. portability_impl.h Core dependent. portability.cpp Core dependent. drivers Miscellaneous drivers not required by Miosix to function, with exceptions (atsam4l clock) *.cpp/h <board name> Board/chip specific files. core Board/chip dependent code required for the OS to function. stage_1_boot.c/cpp/s Chip dependent. Interrupt vector table, reset handler, clock tree setup, bss/data initialization interfaces_impl Important board/chip specific drivers, most of them required by Miosix to function. bsp_impl.h Board dependent. Useful board-specific definitions. bsp.cpp Board dependent. Useful board-specific functions. hwmapping.h Board dependent. GPIO pin definitions. deep_sleep.cpp Chip family dependent. Optional implementation of deep sleep primitives. delays.cpp See above. Sometimes it's here, with no true reason why. arch_registers_impl.h See above. Sometimes it's here, depends on chip. ... Some boards have extra miscellaneous drivers here *.h Some boards have chip registers definitions here (LPC2138) *.cfg Some boards have OpenOCD config files here *.ld Chip family specific. Linker files for different RAM/Flash configurations interfaces Headers for hardware interfaces TO miosix (internals) and SOME interfaces OF miosix to the application (APIs). Only commonality is that they are all hardware dependent (while stuff in utils/kernel is ''generally'' hardware independent) arch_registers.h API. Umbrella for "arch_registers_impl.h", selected through include search path manipulation. atomic_ops.h API. Umbrella for "atomic_ops_*.h", selected through ifdefs. bsp.h API + internal prototypes (IRQbspInit, bspInit2). Umbrella for "bsp_impl.h", selected through include search path manipulation. deep_sleep.h Internal prototypes only. Not an umbrella header. delays.h API. Not an umbrella header. endianness.h API. Umbrella for "endianness_*.h", selected through ifdefs. gpio.h API. Umbrella for "gpio_impl.h", selected through include search path manipulation. os_timer.h Internal declarations. Not an umbrella header. portability.h Internal declarations. Primitives for context switching and syscalls. Umbrella for "portability_impl.h", selected through include search path manipulation. util Additional APIs made available for applications as utilities, built on top of kernel primitives or other drivers lcd44780.cpp/h Driver for Hitachi-standard HD44780 character displays. software_i2c/spi.h Bit-banged i2c/spi implementations. Arguably drivers. utils.cpp/h Memory/CPU usage profiling. Misleading name. Not a driver ... Other files are not related to hardware config Configuration files, user-modifiable Makefile.inc List of board + selection of board to build for + selection of compile time options through defines passed as argument to the compiler. The first section of the file arguably is not user-modifiable configuration. miosix-settings.h Global settings selected through defines in header files arch Board-dependent settings <board group> <board> board_settings.h Board-dependent settings selected through defines in header files
<board group name> is defined as the name of the chip core, followed by an underscore, followed by the name of a chip family. <board name> is defined by the name of the chip, followed by an underscore, followed by a "common name" of the board. For commercial prototyping boards or specific devices, "common name" is derived from the name given by the manufacturer, or a name which is in common use with some exceptions (i.e. stm32f103 bluepill boards are named "breakout").
Some general patterns can be inferred:
- Apart from minor exceptions, directories named core contain drivers required for the OS to function.
- Directories named interfaces_impl generally contain implementations of things defined in /interfaces. Header files in interfaces_impl are always given the ``_impl`` suffix. C++ files are usually not given the "_impl" suffix but sometimes they have it (gpio_impl.cpp).
- Directories named common contain code shared by multiple boards. No attempt is made to separate different levels of commonality apart from chip-family specific stuff which is grouped by board group.
Include paths
The current directory structure allows the Makefile to select the implementation of some file by solely changing the include search paths of the compiler. This mostly applies to files in <board group name>/<board name> and in <board group name>/config. The Makefile defines several variables that are used to refer to specific paths in the directory tree:
Variable | Value Pattern | Scope | Is config | Defined by | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINKER_SCRIPT_PATH | arch/<board group name>/<board name>/ | Board | Yes | Makefile.inc | Directory where the linker scripts are found |
LINKER_SCRIPT | $(LINKER_SCRIPT_PATH)/<script>.ld | Board | Yes | Makefile.inc | Path of the linker script |
ARCH_INC | arch/<board group name>/common | Board group | No | Makefile.inc | Path of the common directory of the board group |
BOARD_INC | arch/<board group name>/<board name> | Board | No | Makefile.inc | Path of the board directory |
BOOT_FILE | $(BOARD_INC)/core/stage_1_boot.o | Board | No | Makefile.inc | Path of the object file for the board bootstrap code |
ARCH_SRC | $(BOARD_INC)/*/*.cpp $(ARCH_INC)/*/*.cpp arch/common/drivers/*.cpp | Board + Board group | No | Sources for the drivers enabled for this board | |
KPATH | miosix | Global | Yes | Appl. Makefile | Root directory of the kernel files |
CONFPATH | $(KPATH) | Global | Yes | Appl. Makefile | Root directory for configuration files |
For reference, the final include paths, defined by the application makefile, are:
$(CONFPATH) $(CONFPATH)/config/$(BOARD_INC) $(KPATH) $(KPATH)/arch/common $(KPATH)/$(ARCH_INC) $(KPATH)/$(BOARD_INC)
Notice that, despite the name of the defines, there is no distinction between include paths and source paths, as includes are alongside the source. We do not have a problem with this approach, however it results in all includes being publicly available for applications, which is something that is not entirely desirable.
Drivers selected by include path
Sometimes Miosix's headers include files that depend on the board selected for building. This of course can give problems when reorganizing files around. The affected files are:
- interfaces/arch_registers.h
- interfaces/bsp.h
- interfaces/gpio.h
- interfaces/portability.h
Overall selecting different files through the include paths is desirable, so we want to avoid adding additional architecture-specific ifdefs as much as possible.
Issues
Experience has shown this organization has the following problems:
- What goes where is not well defined due to the vagueness of directory names
- This leads to files being in the wrong place even though it's not obvious
- servo_* is the most glaring example
- The location of delays.cpp and arch_registers_impl.h is also inconsistent
- This leads to files being in the wrong place even though it's not obvious
- The two level board group/board classification does not reflect reality, which leads to missing code sharing opportunities:
- GPIO implementations are duplicated multiple times as they are common to multiple chip families and not to a single one.
- Bootstrap code is duplicated multiple times as they are common to boards with the same chip and not common to the board.
- Portability code (i.e. context save/restore primitives mostly) is duplicated multiple times as they are common to a given core and not to a chip family
- Linker scripts are also duplicated multiple times
- Classifications sometimes privilege syntax rather than semantics, in an inconsistent fashion
- Directories named interfaces_impl contain drivers just like directories named drivers, except that they included from /interfaces.
- What is common and what is not loosely determined by the amount of code sharing but most stuff not under a common directory is duplicated at least twice
Of course, the root issue is the fluidity of the distinction between chip and chip family, and how each vendor manages and/or defines each family. For instance, STM32 chips all have similar USART (serial) implementations, but at least two versions can be distinguished through different register definitions and feature sets. Therefore the same overall driver can be shared across almost all STM32 chips, however the driver is littered with ifdefs to single out the specificity of each implementation. There is really no strict distinction to what can be found where, as the vendors can and do mix and match peripherals even amongst themselves. For example, some STM32 chips have Synopsis-designed USB interfaces which can also be found on chips from vendors that are not ST.
These considerations highlight that the solution to handling the issue of organizing platform-specific code in a consistent way to minimize code duplication is not to add hierarchy levels, but to remove them. This runs contrary from the naive consideration that "Board includes Chip, which belongs to Chip Family, which contains a Core".
A proposal
Pointing out what's wrong is easy, fixing it up is hard. Of course "what we should do" is a matter of opinion, and a valid answer to that could even be "nothing". Overall, what we ultimately want is for all drivers to be decoupled from boards and board groups, in order to be able to classify each driver depending on its actual logical group it belongs to. We can take this opportunity for a more radical restructuring of Miosix's source tree, or we can opt for more conservative solutions.
With classification per device type
This proposal is the most radical as it splits the drivers in a completely different way than what is currently done: by device type. For instance all USART drivers go in a "serial" directory, all GPIO drivers go in a GPIO directory, and so on. This approach scales well when there are a lot of drivers around, but completely prevents selection of drivers by using the include paths.
The arch directory has been named "platform" because of our general dislike of the "architecture" word, but that's really just a bonus. Most other operating systems use "arch" as a directory for drivers and target-specific stuff, so keeping the name "arch" is also an option. We also moved the interfaces headers under the "platform" ("arch") directory, since they basically are just umbrella headers for various drivers. This loses the distinction of some of them being more essential than others, additional directories can be added for this purpose.
platform arch_registers.h atomic_ops.h bsp.h deep_sleep.h delays.h endianness.h gpio.h os_timer.h portability.h memory_protection.h interrupts.h mpu.h serial.h arch_registers CMSIS <chip/chip family> arch_registers_impl.h ....h core boot <chip> stage_1_boot.c/cpp/s atomic_ops atomic_ops_*.h os_timer *_os_timer.cpp endianness endianness_*.h faults interrupts_*.h mpu *_mpu.cpp/h portability <core> arch_settings.h portability_impl.h portability.cpp gpio <chip/chip family> gpio_impl.cpp/h delays <chip/chip family> delays.cpp drivers arm_dcc.cpp/h deep_sleep deep_sleep.cpp cache cache_*.cpp/h serial *_serial.cpp/h adc *_adc.cpp/h sd *_sd.cpp/h servo *_servo.cpp/h hardware_rng *_hardware_rng.cpp/h rtc *_rtc.cpp/h sgm *_sgm.cpp/h wd *_wd.cpp/h i2c *_i2c.cpp/h software_i2c.h spi software_spi.h display lcd44780.cpp/h ... board <board> bsp_impl.h bsp.cpp hwmapping.h *.cfg linker_scripts <chip> *.ld config Makefile.inc miosix_settings.h <board> board_settings.h
Without classification per device type
This is just the same proposal as before but which classifies drivers only by "manufacturer" or chip. This allows to use the include trick for selecting headers.
platform arch_registers.h atomic_ops.h bsp.h deep_sleep.h delays.h endianness.h gpio.h os_timer.h portability.h memory_protection.h interrupts.h mpu.h serial.h arch_registers CMSIS <chip/chip family> arch_registers_impl.h ....h core <chip/chip family> stage_1_boot.c/cpp/s *_os_timer.cpp *_mpu.cpp/h gpio_impl.cpp/h delays.cpp <core> atomic_ops_*.h endianness_*.h interrupts_*.h arch_settings.h portability_impl.h portability.cpp drivers dcc.cpp/h *_servo.cpp/h software_i2c.h software_spi.h lcd44780.cpp/h <core> cache_*.cpp/h <chip/chip family> deep_sleep.cpp *_serial.cpp/h *_adc.cpp/h *_sd.cpp/h *_hardware_rng.cpp/h *_rtc.cpp/h *_sgm.cpp/h *_wd.cpp/h *_i2c.cpp/h ... board <board> bsp_impl.h bsp.cpp hwmapping.h *.cfg linker_scripts <chip> *.ld config Makefile.inc miosix_settings.h <board> board_settings.h
With minimal changes to the existing structure
arch common CMSIS core boot <chip>_stage_1_boot.c/cpp/s <core>_portability arch_settings.h portability_impl.h portability.cpp <chip family> delays.cpp gpio_impl.cpp/h deep_sleep.cpp (all other existing files) drivers All miscellaneous drivers in board directory are moved here (all other existing files) linker_scripts <chip> *.ld <board group name> common (should now be empty) <board name> interfaces_impl bsp_impl.h bsp.cpp hwmapping.h *.cfg interfaces Unmodified config Unmodified